A Comprehensive Analysis ICODE SLIX2 vs NTAG216 NFC Chips

In the dynamic landscape of Near Field Communication (NFC) technology, the choice of NFC chips profoundly influences the performance and capabilities of various applications. This article delves into a detailed comparison between two prominent NFC chips: the ICODE SLIX2 and the NTAG216.

Understanding ICODE SLIX2 and NTAG216

ICODE SLIX2: Versatility and Advanced Features

The ICODE SLIX2, a member of NXP’s ICODE family, is celebrated for its versatility and an array of advanced features, making it a preferred choice for a wide range of NFC applications.

NTAG216: Enhanced Performance and Efficiency

On the other hand, the NTAG216 stands out for its enhanced performance and efficiency, catering to applications that demand reliable and seamless NFC connectivity.

Memory and Features Comparison


  • Total Memory: 256 bytes
  • User Memory: 224 bytes
  • Max URL Length: 2,032 characters
  • UID Length: 8 bytes
  • Data Retention: 10 years
  • Write Endurance: 100,000 cycles


  • Total Memory: 888 bytes
  • User Memory: 888 bytes
  • Max URL Length: 132 characters
  • UID Length: 7 bytes
  • Data Retention: 10 years
  • Write Endurance: 100,000 cycles

Technical Specifications


  • Chip Thickness: 120 μm
  • NFC Forum Type: 5
  • Operating Frequency: 13.56 MHz
  • Data Transmission Rate: 106 kbit/s
  • Input Capacitance: 23.5 pF
  • Standard: ISO/IEC 15693


  • Chip Thickness: 100 μm
  • NFC Forum Type: 2
  • Operating Frequency: 13.56 MHz
  • Data Transmission Rate: 106 kbit/s
  • Input Capacitance: 50 pF
  • Standard: ISO/IEC 14443 A

Use Cases and Applications


  • Inventory Management
  • Supply Chain Tracking
  • Access Control
  • Loyalty Programs
  • Ticketing
  • Smart Packaging


  • Product Authentication
  • Smart Posters
  • Brand Protection
  • Consumer Engagement
  • Electronic Shelf Labels
  • NFC Marketing

Conclusion: Making an Informed Choice

Both the ICODE SLIX2 and NTAG216 NFC chips offer unique advantages and cater to diverse application requirements. The ICODE SLIX2 excels in versatility and advanced features, making it suitable for a wide array of NFC applications. On the other hand, the NTAG216 boasts enhanced memory capacity and is well-suited for applications that demand extensive data storage.

When selecting between the two NFC chips, it is essential to consider factors such as memory requirements, technical specifications, and specific application needs. By understanding the distinctive capabilities of each NFC chip, businesses and developers can make informed decisions to optimize their NFC-enabled solutions for enhanced performance and functionality.



Social Media

Most Popular

Get The Latest Updates

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

No spam, notifications only about new products, updates.
RFID Tag Maker